Environmental Assay Inc.

Assessment and Remediation Consulting

Home (IAQ And EMFs) | Services | Resources

EMF (Electromagnetic Field) Irritants

"Smart" or Demand Metering


Although digital or time-of-day-consumption-recording meters seem at present to some to be evil incarnate, these "Smart" or Demand Metering or Automated Meter Reading (AMR) has been around since long before personal computers came along. They have been used by the electric utilities to monitor large customer usage to identify their Peak Power Usage times and duration, Reactive Power content, their Total Consumption for revenue purposes, and to coordinate additional power generation as needed to meet demand. These applications consisted of dial-up connections where a computer would dial through a voice-grade phone line that was connected to a meter with a modem, and once a connection was made, the various data points requested were downloaded to the big mothership. For those old enough to remember, Internet access used to be pretty much the same.

However, the desire by some for consumer usage information, and the consumer desire for lower utility rates, have cornered the utilities into identifying the means of satisfying both needs by reducing personnel (meter readers), and rolling out large-scale application of automated metering. While this automated metering can be applied to Water, Gas, Electric, and other services limited only by the imagination of the design engineer, the ones of most interest to the reader seem to be those applied to Electric Power Usage, which will be the focus here (the concepts described apply equally to all utilities' AMR, except for metering on the powerline). Bear in mind, that unless you are fully disconnected from the infrastructure grid, you have a contract for services with several utilities. This contract may severely limit your desire of not having automated metering applied to your services. While their use poses valid privacy concerns, whereby your usage can be tracked to identify your daily activities with excellent accuracy, that is entirely another matter beyond the scope of this document. Many permutations of AMR exist, in a non-exhaustive list as: 1) wired to the power system with direct modulation, 2) wired to the power system via Powerline Carrier, 3) wired via telephone line, 4) wireless activated by drive-by (Mobile AMR), 5) wireless by peer-to-peer (mesh) networking. Any of these can provide data collected daily, hourly, minute by minute, or every data collector's dream (not presently available, but on the drawing board) - real-time data.

One of the early consumer incarnation of Automated Meter Reading (AMR) was with the Turtle AMR, whereby a module on the meter would impress digital data right onto the power wiring. The primary frequency was in the order of 5 to 9.5 Hz and was either coded as a Morse-type intermittent signal, or continuous and modulated with the desired data. Many users in a geographical area meant that there were many frequencies within that range in existence at any one time. Graphically it would look like the sketch below. I believe application of this form of AMR is waning, because data transport is slow.

Turtle AMR

Note that the graphical display on an oscilloscope would only consist of the blue trace, whose Peak value reaches 170 Volts, on either side of Zero, depending on whether that particular peak is positive or negative. The Turtle AMR signal consists of a clipping of that peak below 170 volts, such that over time, the clipping or non-clipping would equate to digital data at whatever the chosen frequency happens to be. The clipping action is highlighted here by my inserted wave-peak connections to show the two frequency scheme, the 60 Hz power and the 6 Hz AMR.

There are some valid concerns here. Namely that the frequency used for data cartage is within the range of human brain waves, and since it is directly impressed on the power wiring, its conveyance is not only toward the electrical substation data collection point, but also toward the indoor living spaces. Considering that more than about 90% of North American homes use Romex wiring, a wire that allows the Voltage to produce Electric Fields indoors, and since the strongest signal level is at the user's residence, allows the immediate conclusion that the AMR data frequencies are immediately available to the consumer as a whole-body exposure via Transformer Action, by way of the Electric (or Electrostatic) field, as highlighted below.

Simplified Transformer Action

Note that in a typical home there are many wires scattered about, sometimes resembling the bars of a birdcage, all energized and emitting Electric Fields 24/7. This sketch only depicts one partial loop to demonstrate that encircling the body and causing Transformer Action, whereby the exposed subject experiences Internal Voltages and Currents that mimic the original signal, is downright easy. Critics will immediately argue that there's not enough signal to elicit biological response. However, the body can respond to the frequencies as well as the intensity, so "windowing" effects can be identified, even at very low levels.

In all of this, bear in mind that the entire gist is to perform the same function in a less expensive way - we wanted it this way, and therefore the utilities are constrained into providing it this way. While this may be a good motive, the consequences may be undesirable, and once in motion, there may be no reverting back as utilities cannot (and will do their utmost to not) cater to each individual's desires or needs, as this would cause cost increases that would have to be passed on to the consumers, them being us.

Some of the variants of automated metering are:

We now come to Wireless AMR, whose data cartage speeds are much, much faster.

Fixed AMR is / was designed to be available to send data 24/7 to a central collecting point on a polled basis, similar to a cellular tower polling a couple of hundred cell phones in a recurring sequence. The data polling must of necessity be infrequent due to the limited storage of any data collection device to collect data on a predetermined basis, lest the recording device become overloaded and stop recording, or lose the oldest data as it recycles storage. Data storage increases the cost of the data collection metering, and there is no continuous monitoring of data because it is a technical impossibility, even in a "digital" world. The best one can achieve is data collected every 5 seconds perhaps, and even that loads up data storage quickly. A simple solution to download more data and restart the data collection cycle is to poll the metering on a more frequent basis. So if you were told that the data is polled once a month or once a week, you may wish to consider that it is being polled every couple of hours or faster.

A more recent concern with Mesh AMR, which is becoming ubiquitous in some regions, is the effect their power source (Switched Mode Power Supply, or SMPS) may have on the occupants. There are at least three issues with SMPS:

  1. A no-impact AMR metering scheme would be the one long employed by the utility with large usage customers, with a voice-grade telephone line to each meter (also easy to implement as most consumers already (and still) have hard-wire phone lines), but this goes against the grain of efforts to pursue the path of least resistance.

  2. BPL metering would employ the BPL carrier that is anywhere between about 50 KHz and 500 KHz. The digital data would be impressed upon this higher frequency carrier, and data cartage speed is fast compared to data directly modulated onto wiring as in the Turtle described above. Considering the previous elaboration of Electric Field presence indoors, we now possibly have this higher frequency present indoors. The body is mostly transparent to frequencies in this range, and the modulation scheme may be complex enough that the body's response, if there is one, may be hard to predict or categorize.

  3. Mobile AMR involves a Radio Frequency (RF) receiver within the meter that is always listening. When an operator comes driving by, the operator's equipment will be broadcasting a series of keying codes specific to the route traveled, and when in sufficiently close proximity, the meter's receiver keys the transmitter and send the data to the mobile operator's electronics. The frequency will vary by vintage of the AMR component's manufacture, but most likely is faster than 100 MHz. The data is infrequently keyed, is of low intensity, and while more economical than walk-by operators, is not as economical as operator-less metering.

  4. Fixed AMR or wireless and operator-less metering is the least expensive, after the cost of the initial roll out. This type uses frequencies typically in the upper hundred MHz, perhaps close to, or even identical to, cellular frequencies. Some use 900 MHz or so, while others use 2.4 GHZ, which is non-licensed, as it was initially intended for ISM (Industrial Scientific and Medical) usage. The next time you get a chance to look at a microwave oven up close, look at its back, and you'll see a label identifying its operating frequency as 2.4 GHz. Surprised?

  5. Mesh AMR is the type where AMR units talk to each other locally, perhaps to limit the transmit power requirement and extend battery life, or perhaps to reduce the number of wireless antenna installations (also reducing the number of residential objections to such contruction).

    1. the units use fast-frequency electrical switching in the Khz range, possibly within the hearing range of humans or animals, causing audible irritation or torment;
    2. the units cause a stream of harmonics on the residential wiring, which may act as a carrier to bring them about throughout the living spaces;
    3. they use Radio Frequency to communicate, where the pulsing nature and/or the repetition rate of the RF may be an issue, as it has very steep on/off transitions and may occur within the hearing range (20 - 20,000 Hz), and it so happens that humans and animals are most responsive to these lower frequencies.
  6. More details can be found at capacitive-filters.html.


The faster data is collected and passed on, the more data can be collect and processed. The data collected can quickly identify living habits of the user, and open them up for pointed marketing from the utility or those to whom the data is sold. The data can be sold to whatever market is available. Can you picture your every action being processed, by an unseeing unfeeling machine, that can determine based on even just the amount of power used, and the time of its occurrence, and the usage of water, and its occurrence, what you are doing in your private residence minute by minute? Is that invasion of privacy?

By necessity. this document can only present the highlights of AMR. The latest objections being the presence of RF with the AMR. The power levels are obviously below the thermal threshold, so the FCC is out of the loop. If there is genuine biological response, then it most likely is associated with the type of modulation, or some other aspect. Is the actual digital data the problem? Not likely, as the modulation schemes are complex and would appear as electrical "noise." Is the rapid-fire turn-on turn-off the problem? That is a possibility, as rapid electrical transitions are associated with the presence of many harmonic frequencies (whole number multiples of the fundamental frequency used), constituting "Harmonics Emissions" discussed elsewhere on this site. These electrical transitions are also be available through the indoor power system in a fashion similar to the Turtle example up above. When one considers that the landscape of the future looks like a wireless "mesh of meshes" for many utilities, the prospect of electrical "silence" becomes more and more elusive.

Should you wish to attempt to keep your home, neighborhood, or town AMR-free, then your only recourse may be your elected officials or the Boards that have jurisdiction over the various utilities. You can state your desire, or demand, to not have AMR installed, realizing that it will in the end cost you more to keep the human meter readers employed.